In the ever-evolving landscape of human rights, the Philippines has recently seen a significant development. Marcos, the current president, has announced the formation of a special body on human rights. This move has sparked a wave of discussions and debates across the nation.
The special body, officially known as the Special Committee on Human Rights Coordination, is chaired by the Executive Secretary and co-chaired by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary. Its members include the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) and the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) secretaries.
The committee is tasked with a wide range of responsibilities, including conducting investigations, ensuring accountability, gathering data on alleged human rights violations by law enforcement agencies, expanding civic space, and implementing national mechanisms for reporting and follow-up.
In contrast, the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) is an independent body created under the 1987 Philippine Constitution. It is mandated to investigate human rights violations. The CHR has been in the best position to do what the “special committee” is tasked to do.
Impacts
On the positive side, the formation of this special body could potentially enhance the government’s mechanisms for the promotion and protection of human rights in the Philippines. It could lead to more thorough investigations, greater accountability, and ultimately, better protection of human rights.
However, there are also potential negative impacts. Critics argue that this could be a political move, aimed at gaining public support and deflecting attention from other pressing issues. They call for transparency in its operations and question the sincerity behind this initiative.
The creation of the special body on human rights is a significant development that could potentially bring about improvements in human rights in the Philippines. However, its effectiveness will ultimately be determined by its actions, not its promises.
For this initiative to be successful, it is crucial that the special body operates with complete transparency and accountability. It should work in close collaboration with human rights organizations, listen to the voices of the victims, and take decisive action against human rights violations.
Furthermore, the CHR should continue its work independently and collaboratively with the special body when necessary. The creation of the special body does not eliminate the need for the CHR. Instead, it adds another layer of bureaucracy aimed at enhancing the country’s human rights mechanisms.
In the end, the success of this initiative will be judged not by its promises, but by its actions. Let us hope that it lives up to its potential and brings about a new era of respect for human rights in the country.
