Every administration leaves a legacy that future generations will remember. As a citizen, community leader, and blogger, I often reflect on how each President has shaped the nation. Looking back, I cannot help but compare the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte with that of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr..
In my personal view, the Duterte administration will be remembered as an era of visible and ambitious government projects. During his term, the country witnessed the implementation of major infrastructure developments under the "Build, Build, Build" program. Roads, bridges, airports, and railway projects became symbols of a government focused on physical development. The rehabilitation and cleanup of the world-famous Boracay Island also demonstrated the administration's willingness to take decisive action to address environmental concerns.
The Duterte administration also faced extraordinary challenges. The siege of Marawi led to the declaration of Martial Law in Mindanao, a controversial but significant decision aimed at restoring order. Later, when the COVID-19 pandemic struck, the government implemented the Social Amelioration Program (SAP), providing financial assistance to millions of Filipino families during one of the most difficult periods in recent history.
Another aspect that stood out during Duterte's presidency was his public stance regarding Vice President Leni Robredo. Despite political disagreements, Duterte repeatedly stated that he would not support moves to impeach the Vice President. To many observers, this reflected a willingness to separate political rivalry from constitutional stability.
In contrast, the Marcos administration, in my opinion, has struggled to establish a defining national project that resonates strongly with the public. While government programs and infrastructure projects continue, many Filipinos appear to associate the administration more with controversies than with landmark achievements. Discussions about flood control issues, budget controversies, and the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte have often dominated public discourse.
I also believe that leadership is measured by how strongly a President stands for the welfare of Filipinos both at home and abroad. Supporters of former President Duterte often point to instances where he publicly intervened on behalf of overseas Filipino workers facing severe legal situations overseas. Whether one agrees with his methods or not, many viewed such actions as evidence of a leader willing to personally advocate for his countrymen.
Another issue that continues to divide public opinion is the treatment of former President Duterte in relation to international investigations. Many of his supporters believe that Philippine sovereignty should remain paramount and that national institutions should address matters involving former government officials. For them, the turnover of Duterte to international legal processes represents a troubling precedent. Others disagree and argue that accountability mechanisms must be respected. Regardless of one's position, the issue has become one of the most consequential political debates of our time.
Perhaps one of the most ironic chapters in Philippine politics is that Duterte was the President who allowed the burial of former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. Yet today, many Duterte supporters feel that the Marcos administration has not extended the same level of political consideration toward Duterte himself.
As a blogger, I acknowledge that every administration has successes, failures, supporters, and critics. No President governs without controversy. However, when ordinary citizens compare the two administrations, many naturally ask a simple question: "What defining legacy will the Marcos administration leave behind?"
History will ultimately provide the answer.
A Challenge to the Next President
To the next President of the Republic of the Philippines:
Lead with vision. Build projects that ordinary Filipinos can see, use, and benefit from. Place national development above political rivalry. Protect the dignity of Filipinos wherever they may be in the world. Fight corruption with consistency, regardless of political affiliation. Respect democratic institutions while safeguarding national sovereignty.
Most importantly, leave behind a legacy that speaks louder than political controversies—a legacy of progress, unity, and genuine service to the Filipino people.
The Filipino people deserve nothing less.
